Those structures deemed to be at a greater risk from direct
strike are usually the largest and tallest structures on
a site.
The Direct Strike Risk Assessment is based on Points 1,
2 and 3 of the 6 Point Plan, and arrived at by considering
the sites specific structural variables as outlined in the
Risk Assessment section of AS1768-1991.
Note that AS1768-1991 has since been revised twice, and
has been replaced by AS1768-2007 released Jan 2007, however
for this preliminary Risk Assessment guideline, the older
AS1768-1991 Risk Assessment is still a useful guide in which
to identify those key risk factors that make up a brief
and preliminary assessment.
We recommend that where this preliminary assessment indicates
a risk assessment greater than “Fair”, a more detailed Risk
Assessment (using the Microsoft® Excel based Risk Assessment
calculator that comes bundled with the current AS1768-2007
Lightning Protection standard) be conducted.
The 5 tables which make up the key risk factors and their
associated indices are as follows:
Table A - Type of structure or use
|
Usage and Contents
|
Value of index
|
Protection not justified having regard to occupancy
and mission critical contents
|
-10
|
Structure and inert contents, infrequent occupation.
i.e. domestic outbuilding, shed, metal chimney or
mast arrangement
|
0
|
|
Structure containing non mission critical equipment,
or small number of people, e.g. Domestic dwelling,
shop, small factory |
1
|
Structure with contents of fair importance, e.g.
Water tower, shop with valuable contents, office,
factory or residential building
|
2
|
Cinema, Church, Education campus, marine vessel
, monuments
|
3
|
Telecommunications, Essential Services, Broadcasting,
Utilities, Museum and galleries, sporting and entertainment
arenas, telephone exchange, computer data centre,
airports and control towers, lighthouse, mineral
processing and industrial plant, power stations,
or other sites of major importance
|
4
|
Petrochemical installations, hospitals
|
5
|
Explosives magazines, munitions manufacture and
fireworks
|
15
|
Table B - Type of construction
|
Type of Construction
|
Value of index
|
Fully metallic structure that is electrically continuous
|
0
|
Reinforced concrete or steel frame structure with
a ferrous metallic roof
|
1
|
|
Reinforced concrete or steel frame structure with
concrete or other non-metallic roof.Small building
of timber or masonry with ferrous metallic roof |
2
|
Large area building of timber or masonry with ferrous
metallic roof
|
3
|
Large area building of timber or masonry with non-metallic
roof. Membrane structures with metallic frames |
4
|
Table C - Height of Structure
|
Height of Structure (mtrs)
|
Value of index
|
|
Exceeding
|
Not Exceeding
|
|
|
0
|
5
|
0
|
|
6
|
11
|
2
|
|
12
|
16
|
3
|
|
17
|
24
|
4
|
|
25
|
34
|
5
|
|
35
|
49
|
6
|
|
50
|
69
|
7
|
|
70
|
100
|
8
|
Table D - Situation
|
Situation
|
Value of index
|
On the flat, at any elevation
|
0
|
Hillside, or mountainous country up to1000m
|
1
|
Mountain top above 1000 m
|
2
|
Table E - Prevalence/Thunder Days
|
Average Thunder Days Annually
|
Value of index
|
|
Exceeding
|
Not Exceeding
|
|
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
|
4
|
7
|
2
|
|
8
|
15
|
3
|
|
16
|
31
|
4
|
|
32
|
63
|
5
|
|
64
|
+
|
6
|
Table E reflects average Thunderday data for a particular
geographic area, where the Australian Annual Thunderday
map produced by the Bureau of Meteorology Thunderday can
be used to reference an accurate risk indice value for inclusion
in the assessment.

Australian Thunder Day Map
Once each of the identified at risk areas are assessed
as per the framework provided by the Risk Assessment
Tables, the resultant indices are then summed and
compared to the assessment results contained in
Table F. Table F provides an
assessment of the risk, and states the need for
protection.
Table F - Assessment of Risk and Need for Protection
|
Risk Index (= A+B+C+D+E)
|
Assessment of Risk
|
Need for Protection
|
|
11
|
Negligible
|
Not needed
|
|
11
|
Small
|
Not needed
|
|
12
|
Fair
|
Might be advisable
|
|
13
|
Medium
|
Advisable
|
|
14
|
Great
|
Strongly advisable
|
|
>14
|
Very Great
|
Essential
|
Should the preliminary risk assessment indicate
there to be “a need for protection”, it is then
recommended that a copy of the AS/NZS AS1768-2007
Lightning Protection standard be purchased, and
a detailed assessment be conducted using the updated
and automated spreadsheet based “Risk Assessment
Calculator “.
Where protection is stated as “Not needed”, this
does not mean that lightning protection should not
be installed. What the Assessment table is suggesting
is that based on the given parameters entered into
the risk assessment process , statistically the
risk is quite low.
It must be remembered that Lightning should always
be understood to be a random and unpredictable event,
and can still affect structures which are stated
as Negligible or Small Risk.
Often the decision to Lightning Protect, or not
to Lightning Protect may be as simple as considering
“what are the costs and consequences of not lightning
protecting.
Disclaimer: The information
contained in this preliminary risk assessment is
provided for information purposes only, and no responsibility
is taken for any losses or damage which might arise
through any use of this information. |

|