Those
structures deemed to be at a greater risk from direct strike are
usually the largest and tallest structures on a site.
The
Direct Strike Risk Assessment is based on Points 1, 2 and 3 of
the 6 Point Plan, and arrived at by considering the sites specific
structural variables as outlined in the Risk Assessment section
of AS1768-1991.
Note
that AS1768-1991 has since been revised” twice”, and has been
replaced by AS1768-2007 released Jan 2007, however for this preliminary
Risk Assessment guideline, the older AS1768-1991 Risk Assessment
is still a useful guide in which to identify those key risk factors
that make up a brief and preliminary assessment.
We recommend
that where this preliminary assessment indicates a risk assessment
greater than “Fair”, a more detailed Risk Assessment (using the
Microsoft ® Excel based Risk Assessment calculator that comes
bundled with the current AS1768-2007 Lightning Protection standard)
be conducted.
The
5 tables which make up the key risk factors and their associated
indices are as follows:
Table
A - Type of structure or use
Usage
and Contents |
Value
of index |
Protection not
justified having regard to occupancy and mission critical
contents
|
-10 |
Structure and
inert contents, infrequent occupation. i.e. domestic outbuilding,
shed, metal chimney or mast arrangement
|
0 |
| Structure containing
non mission critical equipment, or small number of people,
e.g. Domestic dwelling, shop, small factory |
1 |
Structure with
contents of fair importance, e.g. Water tower, shop with valuable
contents, office, factory or residential building
|
2 |
Cinema, Church, Education campus, marine
vessel , monuments
|
3 |
Telecommunications,
Essential Services, Broadcasting, Utilities, Museum and galleries,
sporting and entertainment arenas, telephone exchange, computer
data centre, airports and control towers, lighthouse, mineral
processing and industrial plant, power stations, or other
sites of major importance
|
4 |
Petrochemical installations, hospitals
|
5 |
Explosives magazines, munitions manufacture
and fireworks
|
15 |
Table
B - Type of construction
Type
of Construction |
Value
of index |
Fully metallic structure that is electrically
continuous
|
0 |
Reinforced concrete or steel frame
structure with a ferrous metallic roof
|
1 |
| Reinforced
concrete or steel frame structure with concrete or other non-metallic
roof.Small building of timber or masonry with ferrous metallic
roof |
2 |
Large area building of timber or masonry
with ferrous metallic roof
|
3 |
Large
area building of timber or masonry with non-metallic roof.
Membrane structures with metallic frames |
4 |
Table
C - Height of Structure
Height
of Structure (mtrs) |
Value
of index |
Exceeding |
Not
Exceeding |
|
0 |
5 |
0 |
6 |
11 |
2 |
12 |
16 |
3 |
17 |
24 |
4 |
25 |
34 |
5 |
35 |
49 |
6 |
50 |
69 |
7 |
70 |
100 |
8 |
Table
D - Situation
Situation |
Value
of index |
On the flat, at any elevation
|
0 |
Hillside, or mountainous
country up to1000m
|
1 |
Mountain top above 1000 m
|
2 |
Table
E - Prevalence/Thunder Days
Average
Thunder Days Annually |
Value
of index |
Exceeding |
Not
Exceeding |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
2 |
8 |
15 |
3 |
16 |
31 |
4 |
32 |
63 |
5 |
64 |
+ |
6 |
Table
E reflects average Thunderday data for a particular geographic
area, where the Australian Annual Thunderday map produced by the
Bureau of Meteorology Thunderday can be used to reference an accurate
risk indice value for inclusion in the assessment.

Australian
Thunder Day Map
Once
each of the identified at risk areas are assessed as per the
framework provided by the Risk Assessment Tables, the resultant
indices are then summed and compared to the assessment results
contained in Table F.
Table F provides an assessment of the risk, and states the
need for protection.
Table
F - Assessment of Risk and Need for Protection
Risk
Index
(= A+B+C+D+E) |
Assessment
of Risk
|
Need
for Protection
|
11 |
Negligible |
Not
needed |
11 |
Small |
Not
needed |
12 |
Fair |
Might
be advisable |
13 |
Medium |
Advisable |
14 |
Great |
Strongly
advisable |
>14 |
Very
Great |
Essential |
Should
the preliminary risk assessment indicate there to be “ a need
for protection”, it is then recommended that a copy of the
AS/NZS AS1768-2007 Lightning Protection standard be purchased,
and a detailed assessment be conducted using the updated and
automated spreadsheet based “Risk Assessment Calculator “.
Where
protection is stated as “Not needed”, this does not mean that
lightning protection should not be installed. What the Assessment
table is suggesting is that based on the given parameters
entered into the risk assessment process , statistically the
risk is quite low.
It
must be remembered that Lightning should always be understood
to be a random and unpredictable event, and can still affect
structures which are stated as Negligible or Small Risk.
Often
the decision to Lightning Protect, or not to Lightning Protect
may be as simple as considering “what are the costs and consequences
of not lightning protecting.
Disclaimer:
The
information contained in this preliminary risk assessment
is provided for information purposes only, and no responsibility
is taken for any losses or damage which might arise through
any use of this information.
|